Response 1:
Source: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dahuk/message/2867
Dear Friends
of the Forum:
I have always
read Mr. Mohaimen’s writing with great interest.
His writing somehow brings out the unspoken words that so many hearts would
have spoken should there be a moratorium on social repercussions of one’s
inner thoughts and subconscious vibes. It is good to see that such hearts
do exist in
There are good
things in our society that others can learn from and that we all, the RBs and the NRBs combined are proud
of. There are living examples of the success stories in
I would not
attempt to portray myself as one of the Experts of Bangladeshi Affairs but
have probably adequate information on the subject and that I have the skills
to logically and structurally extrapolate this information
into some meaningful knowledge that can lead my observations into meaningful
conclusions. I would not Claim that most of logical conclusions will
be accurate to the last bit.
I have recently
traveled to
One thing,
however, I have felt is the force of undercurrents that somehow destabilizes
and zeroes out the positive forces. I am not sure what those undercurrents
are but they are very powerful and quite destabilizing. Some of the
statements of Mohaimen have indicated those undercurrents
in very tangible terms. I will try to shade some light into those undercurrents
and try to make some senses out of it. Most of these undercurrents emanate
from the verticalization of the institutional forces.
These institutional forces are major forces in our society and they mostly
neutralize each other through their lobbying representation at the Government
level as they all are represented. The resultant force stemming out
of the undercurrents somehow balances themselves out at the surface. This balancing act has a tremendous
negative outcome of our overall development process. If we are unable
to deal with these under-currents then the current trends of our socio-economic
development will suffer in the long run. We can not just brush off these
under-currents under the rug and pretend that it never existed in the first
place.
Mr. Mohaimen, very eloquently, depicted some of the milestones
of
One of the
headlines caught my eyes the other day, “we are our biggest enemy”.
Not knowing the source of the statement, I prodded through the article and
came to know that the Country Manager of the World Bank in
Probably, we
do not understand the repercussions of our actions and how we are being perceived
by others out of these divisive actions. It might be total ignorance
of our mental capacity to comprehend the outcome of such actions. We
can not just put our heads in the sand and claim that nothing has been happening.
We need to confront these issues in the open and come up with a real and practical
plan of action. Let us deal with the Law and Order situation and then
tackle the corruption issue head on. Should we succeed in tackling these
two issues, we can turn
Kind regards,
Mohammed Saidul Ahsan (Rial)
Response 2:
Source: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dahuk/message/2852
Mr. Mohaimen
has raised some very important and interesting issues in his article. Probably
he is right that an ever-increasing crowd of non-political opportunists around
the power centre has become the main problem for both the ruling party and
the main opposition party. Businessmen and corrupt former army officers and
bureaucrats are outnumbering the professional politicians in our politics.
Although our politicians are corrupt and they lack efficiency, these neophyte
politicians are much more dangerous than the professionals. They do not have
any commitment to anybody, not even to their own party. They have taken it
as a business and so their only goal is to make money. This
group of people show extreme intolerance to other political parties
and persons in order to prove their locality to the party.
I am not sure whether only the government officials are responsible for the
slow progress of industrialisation. However, it
is very shocking to see that the government allocates less than 1.5 percent
of its development budget for the industrial sector. Is it not funny to expect
mass industrialisation with this peanut?
I agree with Mr. Mohaimen that we have a tendency
to highlight the negative sides of the nation and neglect the positive ones.
We even turn a positive development into a negative one by highlighting the
empty half of the glass. I have seen the survey report that says that 90%
of our female children goes to school in paper and
electronic media. However, most of the newspaper gave very little coverage
and some presented it inversely as 'still 10% do not go to school'.
How to change it? Who will come forward? Can our e-forums do something in
this regard?
Imtiaz Ahmed